Ayuso has a plan to increase the birth rate and is ready to carry it out until the end. When he told the Madrid assembly this Tuesday that “it is not possible that we are now in Spain with a rate of 100,000 abortions a year, while there are so many families who want to adopt, who need”, it was a non-event. About March. The strategy that Madrid’s president intends to reverse the region’s demographic winter involves “connecting” pregnant women who have decided to have an abortion with adoptive families, foster care or who are considering surrogacy to reconsider their decision. A measure which, according to experts, seeks to criminalize women who freely decide to terminate a pregnancy and which has a complex legal framework.
At the beginning of the year, the executive of Madrid presented “The most ambitious birth strategy in our history”. It has size 80. Among them, one of “life support for newborns”. In this section, Ayuso announces the implementation of “all measures” aimed at “giving pregnant women an alternative”. Among them, it involves “connecting” women who want an abortion to people who cannot find children for adoption or foster care, or who are considering surrogacy abroad, as this technique is not allowed in Spain.
Sources in the Ministry of Youth, Family and Social Policy told this newsroom that the department is studying how to start these links, that they will be voluntary and that they will target women who want to stop “all options”. Meetings between these women and families who have already adopted or raised minors, or who are in the process of doing so, are “a kind of awareness-raising,” pointing to the same sources they intend to let the latter inform them of their difficulties. First and foremost, evaluate the possibility of carrying your pregnancy to term and then having a baby. Adoption will not be carried out by the same families under any circumstances.
The Madrid administration’s plan has a complex legal framework. Especially if the Congress approves, as planned, the new law on abortion prepared by the Ministry of Equality, which has already passed the Council of Ministers and is in the parliamentary process. The reform would remove the requirement that women receive a sealed envelope of information about rights, benefits and state aid to support motherhood, which has been used in some communities to try to appeal to anti-abortion associations.
The president of the Association of Accredited Clinics for Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (ACAI), Francisco Garcia, described Ayuso’s proposal as “more contempt for women”. “This is nonsense that shows a lack of knowledge about what it means to terminate a pregnancy. Women who have an unplanned pregnancy want to terminate it now and end the unwanted process as soon as possible,” he explains. The vast majority of women who come to the center to terminate a pregnancy, she continues, have a clear decision. Only a small minority have an “ambivalent situation”, that is, doubts whether to stop or continue, but if it is the second case, “to be, not to abandon the adoption”.
Proposals to “desensitize” women seeking abortions are not new. Starting with forcing them to listen to the heartbeat of the fetus and ending with contact with those who want to adopt or have already done so. “Raise awareness for what? Blaming, creating a bad conscience, creating more stigma. Being told being a mother is great and not being a mother or having an abortion, which is a responsible option, is wrong.” criticizes Garcia. This stigma, this negative social evaluation, is what lies behind the suffering of many women who have abortions. ACAI’s president points out that although they are clear about the decision, the stigma creates feelings of guilt.
While President Ayuso on Tuesday referred to “families who want to adopt, who have needs”, both the Community of Madrid itself and Spanish law recognize that adoption is a “child protection measure”. In other words, it tries to meet the needs of minors who do not have families, not the other way around.
“Reading the document [la estrategia de natalidad]The case is clearly wrongly oriented, because it is based on the interest of families in having children, and not on the interest of minors in creating a family, which is the only thing that matters”, explains the vice-president of the Association of Adopters and I salute the Community of Atlas of Madrid, Benedicto Garcia, who has been working in this field for 24 years. Garcia also sees doubts about the development of this idea. It materializes, but, from the beginning, the confrontation of positions of one party (surrogate mother), who is the most vulnerable, in contact with another party (adoptive or host families), who have a series of completely different interests, and we think that this can lead to forcing the woman’s own individual freedom” , – he develops.
Garcia also explains that child protection mechanisms—adoption, open adoption, and various types of foster care—do not cover the unborn, and that while the decision to abort is exclusive to the gestator, the decision to adopt a child is not. . In other words, if a woman decides to give birth and adopt a son or daughter, a process begins in which social services monitor her and study her biological environment, which is a priority in order to analyze the adoption of the child. “The implications are far-reaching,” he explains.
Despite Ayuso’s figures, according to the latest data According to the data of the Ministry of HealthIn 2020, there were 88,269 voluntary terminations in Spain, the lowest rate in a decade. This, despite a speech by the president of Madrid, who accused the left: “It’s stupid what you do with young people, who you tell to be alone, drunk and how many times you want to have an abortion.”
In the initial draft of Ayuso’s birth strategy, the Madrid executive also talked about connecting women who wanted an abortion with couples “considering surrogacy abroad.” This wording remains on some official pages. It is a practice in which, under a contract, a woman receives money for conceiving a child without her genetic marker, which is transferred to another family at birth. In Spain, the Law on Human Reproduction Techniques declares these contracts invalid, and the Supreme Court believes that “they violate the fundamental rights of both the pregnant woman and the child and are therefore clearly against our public order.”
Ana María Linares, general coordinator of the Coordinator of Adoption and Foster Care Associations (CORA) – which brings together twenty organizations throughout the territory – points out that these meetings offered by the community can encourage unofficial or clandestine surrogacy. “If they connect with a family that wants or craves it, it can facilitate child trafficking,” he warns. In addition, he explains, situations can arise that are “very violent for all parties”: “What does that woman feel? And these families? In what sense will this happen? How will it be regulated? What emotional consequences can it have for the parts?” – he asks. It is clear to him that “there is a legal reality, rights that are guaranteed” and that this type of measure “affects the individual freedom of the person seeking an abortion.” “Direct adoption is a protective measure for children who are already born, who are already here,” she recalls.
The theory that preventing women from seeking voluntary terminations would reduce the lists of families willing to adopt the kind that Madrid’s president appears to have subscribed to is not new. It was pronounced by Judge Samuel A. Alito, one of the United States Supreme Court justices who overturned abortion rights in this country, but is opposed by much of the scientific community. “Adoption does not do what abortion does. It does not terminate a pregnancy, alleviate its burden, avoid the risks to a woman’s health, or the psychosocial harm of giving up adoption. In this report Malinda Seymour, a professor at the University of Texas who researches adoption rights.
Sociologist and researcher on abortion and adoption at the University of California, Gretchen Sisson, said that “what we’re seeing is that a lot of people are raising children they didn’t intend to have.” The Washington Post. A study conducted by the same center, based on a thousand women who wanted to have an abortion, showed that out of 150 who were denied this right, only 13 gave the baby up for adoption, 9% of the total number. Study It also finds that “childbirth is associated with more serious health problems than abortion” and that “women who get the abortion they want have more economic stability, are able to set more ambitious goals, raise children (which they already have) in more stable conditions.” And it is more likely that they will have the desired child in the future.”
Source: El Diario